A STUDY GUIDE ACTS 22:1-30
1. A Study Guide
a) A study guide of Acts of the Apostles. It is intended to be expository — to explain and bring out the meaning of the original text. You may use this for your personal bible study or even group bible study.
2. Acts 22:1-30
a) The verses record Paul’s speech to a hostile crowd in Jerusalem.
#1) Acts 22:1-6
22 “Brethren and fathers, hear my defense which I now offer to you.”
2 And when they heard that he was addressing them in the Hebrew dialect, they became even more quiet; and he said,
3 “I am a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia, but brought up in this city, educated under Gamaliel, strictly according to the law of our fathers, being zealous for God just as you all are today. 4 I persecuted this Way to the death, binding and putting both men and women into prisons, 5 as also the high priest and all the Council of the elders can testify. From them I also received letters to the brethren, and started off for Damascus in order to bring even those who were there to Jerusalem as prisoners to be punished.
6 “But it happened that as I was on my way, approaching Damascus about noontime, a very bright light suddenly flashed from heaven all around me,
i) The Hebrew Tongue. Paul had been set upon by the Jews who saw him in the temple. He was rescued by Roman soldiers who carried him upstairs to the barracks. However he requested the commander to let him speak to the crowd from the safety of the stairs, and permission was granted. Paul chose to speak in Hebrew rather than in Greek. This immediately hushed the crowd because they realized that Paul was a 'Hebrew of Hebrews' (Philippians 3:5). A Jew who could speak pure Hebrew had higher status among Jews who lived in Jerusalem. Jews from foreign places who could not speak Hebrew did not command as much respect.
ii) Paul’s credentials. Paul let the crowd know his origins, and his background in the Jewish religion. On all counts he is a man of very high standing; and it did no harm to put that in the crowd’s face. Paul also describes how he himself had been every bit as anti-christian as anyone in that crowd.
iii) Gamaliel. This master of Paul’s education is possibly the same eminent Gamaliel who spoke in the Sanhedrin regarding its treatment of the apostles (Acts 5:34).
iv) Zealous toward God. Paul had never lacked zeal; however his zeal had been "a zeal of God but not in accordance with knowledge" (Romans 10:2). Zeal for God, if fired by ignorance and prejudice, can be very dangerous.
#2) Acts 22:7-11
7 and I fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to me, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?’ 8 And I answered, ‘Who are You, Lord?’ And He said to me, ‘I am Jesus the Nazarene, whom you are persecuting.’ 9 And those who were with me saw the light, to be sure, but did not understand the voice of the One who was speaking to me. 10 And I said, ‘What shall I do, Lord?’ And the Lord said to me, ‘Get up and go on into Damascus, and there you will be told of all that has been appointed for you to do.’ 11 But since I could not see because of the brightness of that light, I was led by the hand by those who were with me and came into Damascus.
i) Three accounts. There are three accounts of Paul’s experience as he came near Damascus (Acts 9:3, Acts 22:6, Acts 26:13).
ii) About noon... a great light. This light was brighter than the strong midday sun (Acts 26:13).
iii) Did not hear the voice. Paul says that his travelling companions did not hear the voice of Jesus who spoke to him (Acts 22:19), whereas Luke says they heard the sound (Acts 9:7). Paul also says that he and his companions all fell to the ground (Acts 26:14). whereas Luke says that Saul fell to the ground and his companions stood speechless (Acts 9:7). This is one of those famous “contradictions” that some people think they have discovered in the Bible. However Luke is hardly likely to write an account that contradicts Paul’s own accounts, and then quote those accounts in the same document! It is easy to reconcile these accounts: Saul and his companions all fell to the ground when the light shone, but his companions stood up before Saul did. Saul heard what Jesus said, but his companions heard only the sound, but did not hear in the sense of catching what was said.
iii) What shall I do, Lord? Saul first asked, “Who are you, Lord?” Perhaps Saul did not know who was speaking to him. More likely, he thought it was Jesus but sought confirmation. When Jesus confirmed that he himself was speaking, Saul then asked, “What shall I do, Lord?” Minutes earlier Saul had been approaching Damascus ready to oppose the followers of Jesus. Saul had thought Jesus to be a dead man. Suddenly Saul found himself speaking to Jesus who was obviously not dead. Saul had to acknowledge Jesus as Lord. For most people, coming to an acknowledgment of Jesus as Lord is a process. For Saul it was an epiphany.
#3) Acts 22:12-16
12 “A certain Ananias, a man who was devout by the standard of the Law, and well spoken of by all the Jews who lived there, 13 came to me, and standing near said to me, ‘Brother Saul, receive your sight!’ And at that very time I looked up at him. 14 And he said, ‘The God of our fathers has appointed you to know His will and to see the Righteous One and to hear an utterance from His mouth. 15 For you will be a witness for Him to all men of what you have seen and heard. 16 Now why do you delay? Get up and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on His name.’
i) Ananias. Paul’s story could be laughed off as a touch of the sun, a moment of insanity in which his mind played tricks. However Paul points out that not only were his travelling companions witnesses to the light, but another man was, independently, quite as involved in the story as Paul. This man, Ananias, was a devout man of good reputation whose story could not be reasonably doubted. Not only did the Lord entrust Saul’s conversion to Ananias, but he also made Ananias able to corroborate Paul’s story.
ii) Saul’s commission. Saul was given his commission to be a witness of the things he had seen. Primarily this meant that he had seen the risen Christ and he was to devote his life to preaching Christ raised from the dead and glorified. Because he was obedient to this commission, Paul found himself on many occasions a prisoner on trial.
iii) Baptism. Saul was commanded to immediately be baptized in the name of the Lord whom Saul now believed and confessed to be Jesus. This baptism came with the promise of an amazing result, which Ananias expresses simply as "wash away your sins" (Acts 22:16). This compares with Peter’s phrase, "the forgiveness of your sins" (Acts 2:38). Paul could have all his terrible acts of persecution, all his raging opposition to Jesus, completely forgiven, as soon as he submitted himself to baptism. Then he could set about preaching, instead of persecuting, the way of Jesus.
iv) Wash away. We should understand that Ananias wasn't preaching “water salvation” to Saul. Whilst baptism is required for one’s cleansing from sin, baptism itself does not cleanse. Rather, in baptism, it is the blood of Jesus shed as a sacrifice for sin, that is the means of forgiveness. We know this because Jesus spoke of his blood as "poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins" (Matthew 26:28). Whilst baptism may be seen as "the washing of water" (Ephesians 5:26), this is understood to be a symbol of the forgiveness of sins. Water can only wash dirt from the body. Water cannot wash sin from the soul. Peter says that baptism "saves us not by washing dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience" (1 Peter 3:21). Baptism is the symbol, not the power. The power is in the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ which baptism symbolizes (see Romans 6).
v) A command to be obeyed. We cannot reject baptism on the grounds that “it is only a symbol”. We must also see it as a commandment of the Lord. Ananias commanded Saul to be baptized. Had Saul rejected baptism, he would have added that rejection to all his other crimes against Jesus, and he would not have had any of his sins washed away. Nobody can benefit from what baptism symbolizes if they refuse to participate in the symbol itself. Why not? Because such refusal is outright disobedience to the clear commandment of God. Can you imagine Saul saying to Ananias, “Thank you, but if you don't mind I'll just have the washing away of my sins without being baptized”? Of course Saul would not have said any such thing! Yet this is effectively what a great many converts to Christ do say, and it is wrong. You can have a meat pie without tomato sauce; but you cannot have forgiveness of sins without baptism. You cannot treat baptism as a non-essential option. You must treat it as a commandment that must be obeyed without delay —following the example of Ananias and Saul.
#4) Acts 22:17-21
17 “It happened when I returned to Jerusalem and was praying in the temple, that I fell into a trance, 18 and I saw Him saying to me, ‘Make haste, and get out of Jerusalem quickly, because they will not accept your testimony about Me.’ 19 And I said, ‘Lord, they themselves understand that in one synagogue after another I used to imprison and beat those who believed in You. 20 And when the blood of Your witness Stephen was being shed, I also was standing by approving, and watching out for the coats of those who were slaying him.’ 21 And He said to me, ‘Go! For I will send you far away to the Gentiles.’”
i) Returned to Jerusalem. Saul showed great courage in going back to Jerusalem. He was expected to bring back prisoners to be punished and killed. Instead he brought back the very gospel that he'd been zealous to eradicate. The Jews weren't about to tolerate this and Saul’s life was in grave danger. Jesus appeared to Saul and warned him of these facts.
ii) Lord they know. Saul seemed to think that knowledge of his former zeal as a persecutor should lead to acceptance of his new zeal as a preacher. Certainly reasonable people would have seen things in that light. But the Jewish enemies of Jesus were not reasonable people, but blind with prejudice. So Jesus told Paul he had to go far away from Jerusalem, so that he could preach where the threat was not so strong.
#5) Acts 22:22-28
22 They listened to him up to this statement, and then they raised their voices and said, “Away with such a fellow from the earth, for he should not be allowed to live!” 23 And as they were crying out and throwing off their cloaks and tossing dust into the air, 24 the commander ordered him to be brought into the barracks, stating that he should be examined by scourging so that he might find out the reason why they were shouting against him that way. 25 But when they stretched him out with thongs, Paul said to the centurion who was standing by, “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman and uncondemned?” 26 When the centurion heard this, he went to the commander and told him, saying, “What are you about to do? For this man is a Roman.” 27 The commander came and said to him, “Tell me, are you a Roman?” And he said, “Yes.” 28 The commander answered, “I acquired this citizenship with a large sum of money.” And Paul said, “But I was actually born a citizen.”
i) They began shouting. The prejudice and hatred, which Saul had encountered after his conversion, was still rife all these years later. Another disgusting exhibition of it ensued.
ii) Lawful to flog a Roman? Lysias the Roman commander saw the need to quell the riot quickly before it worsened, but he needed urgently to know what the fuss was all about, and who better to inform him than Paul. Unwisely, Lysias chose torture as a crude but swift method of getting the information out of Paul. However Paul had a surprise for the Lysias, who did not know that Paul was a Roman citizen of high standing. It was illegal to flog an uncondemned Roman citizen. Even binding him with thongs in preparation for flogging was an illegal act for which the punishment was unthinkable. Paul was no longer at their mercy; they were at his. How quickly a few words can turn everything upside down!
#6) Acts 22:29-30
29 Therefore those who were about to examine him immediately let go of him; and the commander also was afraid when he found out that he was a Roman, and because he had put him in chains.
30 But on the next day, wishing to know for certain why he had been accused by the Jews, he released him and ordered the chief priests and all the Council to assemble, and brought Paul down and set him before them.
i) Ordered the Sanhedrin to assemble. The Roman commander had got himself into a serious predicament, and still had not discovered what the unrest was about. So he made a second attempt to find out. On this attempt, the commander acted in a considered manner and ordered a hearing. He could not use a Roman court, lest his compromised position be discovered. So he ordered the Jewish Sanhedrin to convene and examine Paul. He would attend to guard the prisoner, and thus learn what the Jews had against Paul.
a) A study guide of Acts of the Apostles. It is intended to be expository — to explain and bring out the meaning of the original text. You may use this for your personal bible study or even group bible study.
2. Acts 22:1-30
a) The verses record Paul’s speech to a hostile crowd in Jerusalem.
#1) Acts 22:1-622 “Brethren and fathers, hear my defense which I now offer to you.”
2 And when they heard that he was addressing them in the Hebrew dialect, they became even more quiet; and he said,
3 “I am a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia, but brought up in this city, educated under Gamaliel, strictly according to the law of our fathers, being zealous for God just as you all are today. 4 I persecuted this Way to the death, binding and putting both men and women into prisons, 5 as also the high priest and all the Council of the elders can testify. From them I also received letters to the brethren, and started off for Damascus in order to bring even those who were there to Jerusalem as prisoners to be punished.
6 “But it happened that as I was on my way, approaching Damascus about noontime, a very bright light suddenly flashed from heaven all around me,
i) The Hebrew Tongue. Paul had been set upon by the Jews who saw him in the temple. He was rescued by Roman soldiers who carried him upstairs to the barracks. However he requested the commander to let him speak to the crowd from the safety of the stairs, and permission was granted. Paul chose to speak in Hebrew rather than in Greek. This immediately hushed the crowd because they realized that Paul was a 'Hebrew of Hebrews' (Philippians 3:5). A Jew who could speak pure Hebrew had higher status among Jews who lived in Jerusalem. Jews from foreign places who could not speak Hebrew did not command as much respect.
ii) Paul’s credentials. Paul let the crowd know his origins, and his background in the Jewish religion. On all counts he is a man of very high standing; and it did no harm to put that in the crowd’s face. Paul also describes how he himself had been every bit as anti-christian as anyone in that crowd.
iii) Gamaliel. This master of Paul’s education is possibly the same eminent Gamaliel who spoke in the Sanhedrin regarding its treatment of the apostles (Acts 5:34).
iv) Zealous toward God. Paul had never lacked zeal; however his zeal had been "a zeal of God but not in accordance with knowledge" (Romans 10:2). Zeal for God, if fired by ignorance and prejudice, can be very dangerous.
#2) Acts 22:7-11
7 and I fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to me, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?’ 8 And I answered, ‘Who are You, Lord?’ And He said to me, ‘I am Jesus the Nazarene, whom you are persecuting.’ 9 And those who were with me saw the light, to be sure, but did not understand the voice of the One who was speaking to me. 10 And I said, ‘What shall I do, Lord?’ And the Lord said to me, ‘Get up and go on into Damascus, and there you will be told of all that has been appointed for you to do.’ 11 But since I could not see because of the brightness of that light, I was led by the hand by those who were with me and came into Damascus.
i) Three accounts. There are three accounts of Paul’s experience as he came near Damascus (Acts 9:3, Acts 22:6, Acts 26:13).
ii) About noon... a great light. This light was brighter than the strong midday sun (Acts 26:13).
iii) Did not hear the voice. Paul says that his travelling companions did not hear the voice of Jesus who spoke to him (Acts 22:19), whereas Luke says they heard the sound (Acts 9:7). Paul also says that he and his companions all fell to the ground (Acts 26:14). whereas Luke says that Saul fell to the ground and his companions stood speechless (Acts 9:7). This is one of those famous “contradictions” that some people think they have discovered in the Bible. However Luke is hardly likely to write an account that contradicts Paul’s own accounts, and then quote those accounts in the same document! It is easy to reconcile these accounts: Saul and his companions all fell to the ground when the light shone, but his companions stood up before Saul did. Saul heard what Jesus said, but his companions heard only the sound, but did not hear in the sense of catching what was said.
iii) What shall I do, Lord? Saul first asked, “Who are you, Lord?” Perhaps Saul did not know who was speaking to him. More likely, he thought it was Jesus but sought confirmation. When Jesus confirmed that he himself was speaking, Saul then asked, “What shall I do, Lord?” Minutes earlier Saul had been approaching Damascus ready to oppose the followers of Jesus. Saul had thought Jesus to be a dead man. Suddenly Saul found himself speaking to Jesus who was obviously not dead. Saul had to acknowledge Jesus as Lord. For most people, coming to an acknowledgment of Jesus as Lord is a process. For Saul it was an epiphany.
#3) Acts 22:12-16
12 “A certain Ananias, a man who was devout by the standard of the Law, and well spoken of by all the Jews who lived there, 13 came to me, and standing near said to me, ‘Brother Saul, receive your sight!’ And at that very time I looked up at him. 14 And he said, ‘The God of our fathers has appointed you to know His will and to see the Righteous One and to hear an utterance from His mouth. 15 For you will be a witness for Him to all men of what you have seen and heard. 16 Now why do you delay? Get up and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on His name.’
i) Ananias. Paul’s story could be laughed off as a touch of the sun, a moment of insanity in which his mind played tricks. However Paul points out that not only were his travelling companions witnesses to the light, but another man was, independently, quite as involved in the story as Paul. This man, Ananias, was a devout man of good reputation whose story could not be reasonably doubted. Not only did the Lord entrust Saul’s conversion to Ananias, but he also made Ananias able to corroborate Paul’s story.
ii) Saul’s commission. Saul was given his commission to be a witness of the things he had seen. Primarily this meant that he had seen the risen Christ and he was to devote his life to preaching Christ raised from the dead and glorified. Because he was obedient to this commission, Paul found himself on many occasions a prisoner on trial.
iii) Baptism. Saul was commanded to immediately be baptized in the name of the Lord whom Saul now believed and confessed to be Jesus. This baptism came with the promise of an amazing result, which Ananias expresses simply as "wash away your sins" (Acts 22:16). This compares with Peter’s phrase, "the forgiveness of your sins" (Acts 2:38). Paul could have all his terrible acts of persecution, all his raging opposition to Jesus, completely forgiven, as soon as he submitted himself to baptism. Then he could set about preaching, instead of persecuting, the way of Jesus.
iv) Wash away. We should understand that Ananias wasn't preaching “water salvation” to Saul. Whilst baptism is required for one’s cleansing from sin, baptism itself does not cleanse. Rather, in baptism, it is the blood of Jesus shed as a sacrifice for sin, that is the means of forgiveness. We know this because Jesus spoke of his blood as "poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins" (Matthew 26:28). Whilst baptism may be seen as "the washing of water" (Ephesians 5:26), this is understood to be a symbol of the forgiveness of sins. Water can only wash dirt from the body. Water cannot wash sin from the soul. Peter says that baptism "saves us not by washing dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience" (1 Peter 3:21). Baptism is the symbol, not the power. The power is in the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ which baptism symbolizes (see Romans 6).
v) A command to be obeyed. We cannot reject baptism on the grounds that “it is only a symbol”. We must also see it as a commandment of the Lord. Ananias commanded Saul to be baptized. Had Saul rejected baptism, he would have added that rejection to all his other crimes against Jesus, and he would not have had any of his sins washed away. Nobody can benefit from what baptism symbolizes if they refuse to participate in the symbol itself. Why not? Because such refusal is outright disobedience to the clear commandment of God. Can you imagine Saul saying to Ananias, “Thank you, but if you don't mind I'll just have the washing away of my sins without being baptized”? Of course Saul would not have said any such thing! Yet this is effectively what a great many converts to Christ do say, and it is wrong. You can have a meat pie without tomato sauce; but you cannot have forgiveness of sins without baptism. You cannot treat baptism as a non-essential option. You must treat it as a commandment that must be obeyed without delay —following the example of Ananias and Saul.
#4) Acts 22:17-21
17 “It happened when I returned to Jerusalem and was praying in the temple, that I fell into a trance, 18 and I saw Him saying to me, ‘Make haste, and get out of Jerusalem quickly, because they will not accept your testimony about Me.’ 19 And I said, ‘Lord, they themselves understand that in one synagogue after another I used to imprison and beat those who believed in You. 20 And when the blood of Your witness Stephen was being shed, I also was standing by approving, and watching out for the coats of those who were slaying him.’ 21 And He said to me, ‘Go! For I will send you far away to the Gentiles.’”
i) Returned to Jerusalem. Saul showed great courage in going back to Jerusalem. He was expected to bring back prisoners to be punished and killed. Instead he brought back the very gospel that he'd been zealous to eradicate. The Jews weren't about to tolerate this and Saul’s life was in grave danger. Jesus appeared to Saul and warned him of these facts.
ii) Lord they know. Saul seemed to think that knowledge of his former zeal as a persecutor should lead to acceptance of his new zeal as a preacher. Certainly reasonable people would have seen things in that light. But the Jewish enemies of Jesus were not reasonable people, but blind with prejudice. So Jesus told Paul he had to go far away from Jerusalem, so that he could preach where the threat was not so strong.
#5) Acts 22:22-28
22 They listened to him up to this statement, and then they raised their voices and said, “Away with such a fellow from the earth, for he should not be allowed to live!” 23 And as they were crying out and throwing off their cloaks and tossing dust into the air, 24 the commander ordered him to be brought into the barracks, stating that he should be examined by scourging so that he might find out the reason why they were shouting against him that way. 25 But when they stretched him out with thongs, Paul said to the centurion who was standing by, “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman and uncondemned?” 26 When the centurion heard this, he went to the commander and told him, saying, “What are you about to do? For this man is a Roman.” 27 The commander came and said to him, “Tell me, are you a Roman?” And he said, “Yes.” 28 The commander answered, “I acquired this citizenship with a large sum of money.” And Paul said, “But I was actually born a citizen.”
i) They began shouting. The prejudice and hatred, which Saul had encountered after his conversion, was still rife all these years later. Another disgusting exhibition of it ensued.
ii) Lawful to flog a Roman? Lysias the Roman commander saw the need to quell the riot quickly before it worsened, but he needed urgently to know what the fuss was all about, and who better to inform him than Paul. Unwisely, Lysias chose torture as a crude but swift method of getting the information out of Paul. However Paul had a surprise for the Lysias, who did not know that Paul was a Roman citizen of high standing. It was illegal to flog an uncondemned Roman citizen. Even binding him with thongs in preparation for flogging was an illegal act for which the punishment was unthinkable. Paul was no longer at their mercy; they were at his. How quickly a few words can turn everything upside down!
#6) Acts 22:29-30
29 Therefore those who were about to examine him immediately let go of him; and the commander also was afraid when he found out that he was a Roman, and because he had put him in chains.
30 But on the next day, wishing to know for certain why he had been accused by the Jews, he released him and ordered the chief priests and all the Council to assemble, and brought Paul down and set him before them.
i) Ordered the Sanhedrin to assemble. The Roman commander had got himself into a serious predicament, and still had not discovered what the unrest was about. So he made a second attempt to find out. On this attempt, the commander acted in a considered manner and ordered a hearing. He could not use a Roman court, lest his compromised position be discovered. So he ordered the Jewish Sanhedrin to convene and examine Paul. He would attend to guard the prisoner, and thus learn what the Jews had against Paul.
Comments
Post a Comment